Jump to navigation

Would you offshore your call centre now?

14-Apr-2005

RSS Icon Post a comment Print this article Send to a friend
This item has 8 comments.
Click here to read the comments

Cath Everett, Guest EditorThis week's revelations over the theft last year of $350,000 from US Citibank customers are likely to have repercussions well beyond the four unfortunates feeling the pinch.

Not only does the incident threaten to undermine the entire offshore outsourcing market for call centres, but it is almost certain to lead to calls for stricter regulation of business process outsourcing (BPO) activities in a more general sense.

But anyway, not to walk before we can run, let’s recap on the story to date: Four Citibank customers noticed that money was missing from their accounts and alerted Citibank to the situation. Citibank traced the incident back to the call centre of its business process outsourcing provider, Mphasis, in Pune, India, and three former employees were subsequently arrested along with nine other alleged gang members.

The three are accused of stealing the customers’ phone numbers, tricking them into giving the PIN numbers of their accounts during an off-site call and transferring funds into fraudulent bank accounts belonging to other members of the group.

And all this despite the fact that Mphasis has BS7799 and CMM Level 5 quality certification.

The company itself claims that the findings of initial investigations vindicate it by showing that its security procedures and detection systems worked and that enforcement was key to catching the culprits.

But the National Association of Software and Service Companies in India appears to be taking a dimmer view of the incident and has stepped in to try and limit potential damage.

It now plans to set up a national database to register members of the country’s software development and outsourcing industry. These details will be checked and verified by an agency and potential employers will pay for information about staff backgrounds during the hiring process.

But will it be enough? Forrester Research, for one, thinks not. Instead, it expects the number of organisations outsourcing their call centres offshore to plummet by as much as 30 per cent over the coming months, driven partly by a desire among organisations to set up their own captive centres abroad in a bid to exert greater control over operations.

However, the researcher makes it clear that this situation hasn’t only been brought about by security concerns. Regulatory pressures and the resultant concentration on risk management issues combined with high levels of customer dissatisfaction have also caused a backlash.

And what all this means is that, for the time being at least, any decisions by companies thinking about ramping up existing initiatives are likely to be put on hold. Not good news for the call centre offshore outsourcing industry.

But there are also lessons to be learned from this in a broader sense. The question is, if the quality of Mphasis’ business processes was good enough to pass stringent certification requirements, is there another factor at play here?

Forrester raises the spectre of staff turnover and this is certainly not a phenomenon that is limited to the offshore world. Attrition rates have currently peaked at between 50 and 100 per cent in the BPO world at least, and this level of churn simply undermines organisations’ ability to stick to defined process and do sufficiently rigorous background checks – they simply don’t have time or resources to do so.

So there are lessons to be learned here for all of us and one of the biggest is that keeping call centres working effectively is not just a matter of upping staff productivity levels. It’s about ensuring that the psychological contract between personnel and the organisation is functioning effectively and that employees are happy, loyal and motivated enough to stay.

And for this, there is no quick fix. While things like competitive salary and benefits always help, they aren’t enough on their own. Most people also want ‘soft’ benefits such as feeling fulfilled in their job, gaining a sense of accomplishment and enjoying the environment they work in.

To achieve this, however, it is as much about getting management style right as it is about engendering a positive corporate culture. What it is certainly not about is sticking in a computer system to keep tabs on people. So be warned.

Cath Everett
Guest News Editor
editor@mycustomer.com

As always, please use the 'Add your own comment' link below to post your thoughts on this article. Do you think this case will mark a shift in attitudes to offshore outsourcing?


MyCustomer.com  14-Apr-2005
Story read 5890 times

This item has been given an average rating of by 3 user(s)
User Comments: 8

Salary versus Security

Sebastian Barcelo  19-Apr-2007 @ 14:27PM
   
One of the security risks that ISO17799 (BS7799) manifests is the employees satisfaction. If you do not have enough, don't keep them happy and don't pay them well, you can have a serious issue.

But, what can you expect from a group of young guys, that are probably from a low income environment and paid peanuts (even if it is high for their standards)? To manage thounsands of bucks per day? I wouldn't.

And, BTW, what penalty did they suffer? To be fired?

No service that is suppossed to involve money or the possibility to earn from it in any way should be outsourced to a "low-cost-geography". Even those that manage personal information, strating from your phone numbers. Risk is too high, damage unvaluable.

What Customers and Consumers need is the compliancy from their supplier with the legislation of the place where they arr located, not with the outsourced country.

offshoring to contractor will be affected for other reasons.

uday pasricha  28-Nov-2005 @ 05:49AM
   
Criminal activity and fraud has little to do with location, because the SAME mindset and qualifications would be used even in the host country. Most likely the person would also be from Asia. The main opposition to offshoring is the transfer of "secure and confidential information" to an 'outsourced contractor" as there has to be some interpretation of law that will prevent 'secure' customer information leaving the host country. IF the company runs its own offshore centre then it would perhaps mean that the DATA is not being shared and given away OUT of the country. The only downside is that customers would never get to know about fraud as it has been publicised here, because INHOUSE the fraud would just be hushed up as it perhaps has for millions of credit card violations that take place every year within our accounts and the general public never get to hear about it as consumers.
Finally it is about 'differentiating" between service industry and product manufacturing. the consumer and the producer of services BOTH are run by the same accounting mindset that is totally focused on "cutting costs".
I eranestly recommend that service providers atleast TRY and offer GOOD service and cost it. let us experience the "differential" service, and educate us about the cost. Most will pay depending on HOW important their bank account, or cell phone or credit card is to their day to day life. When there are a few dozen million customers it is daft to claim that ALL customers are equal. NOT every one needs the SAME level of service and ALL customers therefore cannot be treated equally.
The same managers and accountants can see the huge differential in costs of very similar manufactured products, so why do they try and behave and tell us that "all customers are treated equally". It may be a shame to admit but every sane marketing person will tell you that business and profit is a result of creating "differentiation".Do it before we all take the advice of Jakub Bielikowski and start to 'think with our feet".

Similar things have happened right here in the US

Vivek Pai  10-Jun-2005 @ 05:39AM
   
This is one of the first incidents of this sort, which has happened in the last 5 years at a call centre in India.
FYI, the number of frauds of this nature have happened more often righ here in the US call centres.
I think the incident is being blown out of proportion

Tanveer

Neil Watson  15-Apr-2005 @ 14:52PM
   
The issue is not about systems and processes, it is about people. The same kind of issue can easily arise in any business if the staff churn is high or the staff do not feel any loyalty to the business.

I am working on a home-shoring concept that will allow people who are normally disenfranchised fram this kind of work to access it (www.ki-work.com, if anyone is interested). The trick is to engage staff so they understand what the business wants AND what the customer wants equally. Cost needs to come third as poor service does lead to loss of business - everywhere monopolies have been broken up the winners are the organisations that provide the best service (where best is defined in customer terms, not necessarily highest quality)

Agree - onshore is not any safer

Jakub Bielikowski  15-Apr-2005 @ 08:05AM
   
The comments above are completely right. In the past criminal incidents were taking place despite the fact that all activity was done in the host country according under close management supervision. And no-one was crying for closing of bank branches because of incidental (or potential) fraud.
Key problem is that most companies perceive customer contact as burden, not as value adding activity. Therefore there is more focus on savings then any quality or reliability.
And until someone can provide clear link between top line and customer service quality it will remain like that. We - customers are also to blame, because instead of voting with our feet we stick to lousy vendors.

Spot On!

William Austin  15-Apr-2005 @ 01:16AM
   
Just another horror story in a long list. The issue here is not just about outsourcing, its about the fundamental failure of large organisations to even remotely recognise what customer relationship is all about. The concept of outsourcing a call centre to India has nothing to do with customer relationaship management (CRM) - it's purely to do with cost management (or, more appropriately, cost-cutting management - CCM). The old adage applies - 'you get what you pay for'. The sad part is that management today seem to have no idea just how 'pissed off' their customers are.

Onshoring? Better alternative?

Tanveer Bindra  14-Apr-2005 @ 17:38PM
   
And how would onshoring jobs to the home country change the situation? Remember its not the system but the people in it that were at fault in this case. And for one no law can fundamentally change the psychology of a criminal.

Would you offshore your call centre now?

Bartosz Fijalkowski  14-Apr-2005 @ 15:57PM
   
I'm looking for contacts to CC proffesionals who are interested to offshore their CC operations to Poland.

b.fijalkowski@wp.pl

Related downloads


Related articles

OutsourcingCRM systems and technologyCall centresChannel managementChannelling enquiriesComplaint handlingCustomer portfolio managementStrategyCustomer retention programmesCustomer satisfactionMoving services and technology offshoreFeaturesCRM - News editorialsEditorials