You can also download this report in PDF format. Download now!
"We’ve done CRM; we’re concentrating on CEM!" – reverberates worldwide. In many companies CRM = Technology; CEM = Customer Focussed Business. Leaving aside the terminology debate, 'the business' seems belatedly to be taking a lead on the customer front. But, they should have been there from the start, plotting and planning technology adoption with IT to enhance the customer proposition. To think IT is now ‘done’ is a gross mistake: IT is an Aladdin’s cave of potential business opportunity that needs communal management.
(CRM- Customer Relationship Management, CEM – Customer Experience Management)
Two Techniques
Improving service and experience; engaging and collaborating with stakeholders; listening and learning; customer insight; the list of customer business initiatives goes on and it all needs technology support. Not from restrictive 'out of the box' applications, but from full-blooded infrastructure support which combines user applications, middleware, databases, networks and delivery method – on-site or on demand.
How is this to be managed? IT doesn't have the customer knowledge or remit to determine sources of competitive advantage; marketing doesn’t have the IT knowledge. Marketing thinks IT fails to deliver business value, IT thinks marketing is an unaccountable irrelevance. In only one third of companies do the two departments say they have fruitful relationships.
Companies serious about bridging the IT/marketing divide are dedicating IT staff to the marketing department to tackle heavy duty IT work such as data transformation and analysis; and it is having a positive effect. But strategic collaboration is also needed to tackle business innovation through IT investment. "Entrepreneurs are creating business value by spotting technology-fuelled opportunities in the markets and going out and sourcing the technology. Thus, IT value creation has become a 'business pull', not an 'IT push'" says Gartner VP, Andy Kyte.
Two techniques that combine the forces of 'pull' and 'push' are the Gartner 'hype cycle' and 'technology radar map'. Together they are powerful collaborative tools to assess the risks and benefits of technology investment. Both should be on every marketing and MBA syllabus – alongside such stalwarts as the Boston Matrix, SWOT analysis, and customer lifecycle mapping.
Hype Cycle
The hype cycle is a 'picturesque' tool for plotting the emergence and adoption of technology that may provide business opportunity. It charts the inevitable learning path from over enthusiasm, to disillusionment, to a full understanding of relevance.

The vertical axis gives the visibility of the technology (see appendix for definitions) in the market; the horizontal axis its degree of maturity in use, which can range from a few or many years. Typically, the technology follows a series of stages:-
Stage 1 – Technology Trigger – New technology is taken up by enthusiasts; at this stage it is untested and experimental. But people love the 'new' and the technology gets talked about and reported – it starts to be 'hyped up' as the next best thing to sliced bread.
Stage 2 – Peak of Inflated Expectation – At this stage, the technology is 'hot' with many people talking about its benefits – few are using or understand it but a lot are looking.
Stage 3 – Trough of Disillusionment - The early majority have started to implement the technology but it doesn't live up to expected benefits. Problems occur, frequently due to lack of attention to supporting changes e.g. in data, culture and processes. The technology gets negative 'hype' and slips down into the trough, where it may fade from the market or move to stage 4.
Stage 4 - Slope of Enlightenment – The problems are slowly solved through pilots, by an increasingly diverse range of organisations. This leads to a true understanding of business value.
Stage 5 – Plateau of Productivity – The technology becomes accepted as part of productive life in an organisation.
The hype cycle is a useful reminder of where different technologies are, at any point in time, in terms of maturity and adoption. It is a reminder not to see technology as a 'silver bullet' because of hype and not to ignore its opportunities when the going gets tough.
Technology Radar Mapping
The technology radar map is a planning and prioritisation tool for customer value propositions and competitive advantage, over a 10 year time period. It looks at the impact of a technology on a market and the opportunity it is likely to give a particular business. It should be tailored for each business.

With the radar map, the vertical axis is the potential business impact/benefit of the technology - will it improve the way current business is done; create the means to offer customers new propositions; or change the market? The horizontal axis is the time taken for the technology to reach maturity in adoption in a market.
When plotting technology on the radar map your customers’ needs should be firmly in mind. Other considerations are businesses and IT competence, along with contextual information such as a PEST and competitors’ market positions. Plotting out relevant technologies MUST be a join IT/Marketing responsibility; assumptions for each position must always be given, on both sides.
Priority investments will be to the left of the radar map: the further right, the more the focus should be on innovative use and experimentation.
The radar map is an ideal tool for:-
When combined with the hype cycle it is an excellent tool for overcoming 'pet projects'; the 'who has the greatest clout' syndrome; and the smoozing of senior management on the golf course by IT companies.
(NB – Data on both the above illustrations is taken from Gartner’s 2005 CRM and Emerging technology charts)
Different Mindsets
IT and marketing have different mindsets. IT is naturally more risk adverse, tasked traditionally with reducing costs: marketing is geared to finding growth through opportunities. According to a recent McKinsey survey, 81% of business leaders worldwide say IT innovation is very important to business growth; but not unsurprisingly, IT and marketing differ over the how. IT look at improving current services; marketing want new solutions: IT see productivity as automating business processes, marketing look to economies of scale such as outsourcing.
The power of the hype cycle and radar map techniques is that they act as a catalyst to bring these mindsets together, they give customer knowledge to IT and technology understanding to marketing and so enable the spotting and greater creation of business value.
Please add your own thoughts and opinions by clicking on the 'Add your own comment' link below.
Jennifer Kirkby
Strategy & Business Analyst, CMC
jennifer.kirkby@mycustomer.com
Find out more about Jennifer Kirkby
The Technologies
The technology examples on the charts go beyond packaged marketing applications. They demonstrate the breadth of technology, marketing and IT should be examining together in order to deliver business value to customers.
MyCustomer.com 19-Apr-2006
Story read 6927 times
Ultimately, business is about creating value for people profitably - by saving them time, by increasing convenience, by helping them feel good, by reducing riskes, etc. So, in any business that's not purely short-term and transactional (such as buying snacks from vending machines) there's some degree of customer relationship.
When a customer-supplier relationship develops loyalty (even as simple as preferring one corner gas station over another) then you enter the realm of customer relationship management. That is, you have a relationship to manage, and managing it well can be mutually profitable.
This is why I shake my head in disbelief at those in the CRM field who mistakenly believe that CRM is all about technology. Doesn't the technology help you track your dealings so that you can better serve customers?
No doubt CRM means much more to those who work in the tech side of it all the time. Yet, in any business that's not always short-term and transactional, there is some degree of RELATIONSHIP. Manage your client realtions well and you should have happy, loyal clients and profitable business. What matters more in CRM?
- Glenn Harrington
www.HarringtonNewsletter.com
No great surprises here, IT and Marketing speak different languages and all to often have opposing priorities.Where is the education to bridge this divide?
One of my clients has made in-roads here by putting a data savvy, IT person into their marketing department and has put them on a Marketing programme run by the IDM.
As a result their "Event Trigger Marketing" and "Segmentation" is moving up the "Slope of Enlightenment" - no it's not where Gartner would have us believe it is. But this is not so for the majority.
For me Gartners methods for presenting technology trends continue to be informative,. Both of these are useful tools.
David Willis @ Information Drivers
Data Exploitation Specialist
Missing the Point Entirely
Like Glenn, I feel that you almost completely missed the point of your own article; that it is providing "value to customers profitably" where the focus should be, rather than on the latest hot technology. And that goes just as much for CEM as for CRM.
The article starts well with a discussion of the well-documented differences that exist between IT & marketing. These differences are hardly new, indeed, the concept of the part-IT, part-marketing "Hybrid Manager" was much in discussion when I joined KPMG as a Management Consultant back in 1985! But after castigating early CRM for its failure to focus on anything else other the technology, the article quickly turns into long-list of technologies which are in various states of development or implementation, and various technology diffusion models of questionable origin and value for most marketing managers.
There is not a single mention of customer-focussed strategy, staff development, organisational change readiness, measures & incentives or any of the factors that are proven to drive success in CRM and by implication, in CEM. And just to remind ourselves of the role of technology in CRM; all of the robust, independent studies to-date have shown clearly that once a minimum enabling level of CRM technology has been reached, it does NOT influence success in CRM at all.
In many ways, the article shows what's most wrong with many of the technology-focussed analysts today. It show how they are more interested in the technology itself than in the businesses the technology they promote so assertively is supposed to enable. The much hyped Hype Cycle (and one has to ask exactly who is doing much of this hyping) and Technology Radar Map should be seen for what they are; sales tools for technology-focussed analysts.
If you want to see how real companies have crossed the IT-Marketing divide, then pick up your Google browser and look for articles describing how Capital One generates and uses customer insight, or Thomke's work on how internal markets across organisations work, or work by IBM, Mckinsey, CGE&Y and others on adaptive marketing organisations, and, and, and.
Graham Hill
Independent CRM Consultant