By Jennifer Kirkby, business analyst and consulting editor
CSR is a customer service.
In a recent interview Tesco CEO Terry Leahy espoused the belief that organisations should help customers make a contribution to climate change through the products and services they offer. In other words, and to broaden the subject to all socially responsible issues, every company should build responses to relevant ‘socio-political’ trends into their customer value propositions as a matter of good business.
Corporate social responsibility (CSR) should not be just a bandwagon response for public relations; nor an extra curricular activity for staff; nor a glossy ‘feel good’ sustainability brochure for shareholders; and definitely not a politically correct stick for activists to flog ‘non-believers’. But it should be seen as a driver for innovation and an opportunity to give consumers the wherewithal to ‘do something’ towards the social and environment issues of the day. CSR is not just an organisation’s own social contract, but also a ‘personal responsibility’ service.
What is the business of business?
Tesco is not alone in spotting the need for business to look to socio-political issues. The UK Conservative party, traditionally a party of business, is currently undergoing a re-election makeover. One strand of ‘new’ thinking to win over powerful NGOs and appeal to marginal voters is to ‘promote responsible businesses’; a consultation paper is doing the rounds.
The problem with this for business, is that governments appealing to NGOs and activists have a tendency to regulate, rather than promote, businesses into responsibility. And indeed, solutions in the discussion paper are all about ministers for moral persuasion, lauding and shaming through gold, silver and bronze responsibility awards; and even an idea for ‘social pollutant’ trading schemes for issues such as work-life balance. An indication of the belief that left to its own devices business would not be socially responsible.
Yet the role of business in society has been debated for centuries, and social responsibility would hardly be a surprise to the founders of such long standing companies as Cadburys, Levers, Zeiss, John Lewis and Rowntrees. Economically, the debate centres around two extreme's views – the neo classicists and the ‘social collaborators’.
Neo classicists ("the business of business is business")
• Profit maximises; social welfare is peripheral
• Focus on ownership and shareholder earnings
• Control of firm and resource allocation is through the free-market
• The firm is opportunistic and move to the greatest profits
• Bottom line
Social collaborators ("the business of business is social")
• Profit optimiser in line with welfare and environmental economics
• Focus on collaboration and a balance of economic rent
• Control of the firm is through internal governance and social networks
• The firm builds sustainability and adapts to market changes
• Triple bottom line
Business scandals such as Enron, WorldCom and Barings have rained fatal blows down on the prevailing neo-classical view of late. Consumer suspicion and mistrust of ‘big business’ is rising, heightened by films such as ‘Wal-Mart: The High Cost of Low Prices’and ‘Super Size Me’ about McDonalds.
Recognising the wind of change, many organisations have responded with defensive CSR initiatives, often disconnected from everyday business reality. But the forward sighted are now shifting towards the ‘social collaboration’ view, seeing CSR as both an integral part of corporate strategy and an opportunity to carve out new market niches, create value and gain competitive advantage.
If we can unleash a new, entrepreneurial, collaborative kind of philanthropy, we can create new patterns that help reshape the entire system - combining the innovation of the business world, the passion and humanity of the non-profit world, and the inclusive, networked culture of the digital world to generate transformative change.
Of course the press and activists still rant that they ‘smell a buck’ in such actions, their fractional thinking overlooking the fact that economic growth is generated by business alone: the greatest need in poverty stricken areas such as Africa is to attract business capital – an opportunity that the Chinese are now exploiting.
Integrate CSR with CRM for real social benefits
So how does a business negotiate a social contract with demanding stakeholders, before being tangled up in productivity-sapping regulations and award schemes? How does it resoundly demonstrate social benefit? Media sceptics are matched by employee saboteurs and customer cynics. Meanwhile, newly appointed CSR executives beaver away trying to work out their remit – risk management or transformational change?
Enter stage right the evolving practices of CRM to bind CSR into the organisation; whilst CSR entwines with CRM to give emotional empathy to relationship building – the activists ‘stock in trade’ after all. In both terms the R-word is the emphasis: responsible relationships, the foundation of mutual benefit, achieved via games theory (see The Customer Manager's Dilemma).
So, where to integrate CSR and CRM? A few starter ideas would be:
• A vision that focuses on a purpose of value rather than market dominance of shareholder value, eg that of Merck: “We try never to forget that medicine is for the people. It is not for the profits. The profits follow. When we have remembered that, they have never failed to appear. The better we have remembered it, the larger they have been.” Rather than Pfizer: “So far as humanly possible we aim to get profit out of everything we do.”
• Combining CRM and CSR capability audits
• A marketing strategy that starts with market trends and issues in a PEST analysis, moves through the impact on customer relationship segments and scenario planning, and ends with the how toos of relationship building
• Customer and stakeholder research that uses
'voice of the customer'techniques (see The Voice of The Customer).
• Internal education, coaching and briefing on the brand promise and stakeholder issues so that they are taken account of in customer service and decision-making
• Techniques for customer and staff co-creation that help an understanding of emotional drivers and encourage innovative solutions. Eg open source design communities; Dove’s campaign for real beauty
• Building processes that start with the customer’s journey and experience and are cross references against CSR needs, and so build the responsible brand promise into the fabric of service
• Understanding the listening and learning process in stakeholder engagement
• Integrating customer communication and making it more informative and relevant, eg Tesco’s carbon counter scheme
• Establishing balances score card measurement systems
Corporate activism and the big issues
Two important integration tasks are the identification of relevant issues, and the formulation of responses for different scenarios. Firstly, to overcome the threats and create business opportunities; secondly, to earn a ticket to the debate shaping and solving issue. Think Anita Roddick, Richard Branson and John Browne. Businesses should themselves become corporate activists and recapture industry shaping forces from critics; CSR is not just an antidote to virulent NGOs.
However, in general, business is not good at spotting issues on the horizon, let alone shaping them. A 2006 McKinsey study found that although CEOs acknowledged a remit wider than shareholder returns, they admitted to handling social and environmental matters poorly. The main reasons were:
• Short-term financial pressure, especially on inward costs and productivity
• Lack of expertise with different issues, eg climate change
• A habit of seeing issues as risks to be managed by corporate affairs of legal functions
Academic research on CSR highlights the problem as differences in cultural values. In wealthier countries, executives tend to put shareholders first; other stakeholders come lower down the list. The opposite is true in poorer countries with less social support from government. This behaviour is driven by values regarding the balance of responsibility between groups and individuals. Poorer communities often believe in the interdependence of individuals who have collective duties and obligations that outweigh personal concerns. By contrast, other nations believe that individuals should give loyalty to particular groups within a society (eg family or employer) as a priority – hence the primacy of shareholders.
But driving the current CSR agenda is a third cultural manifestation, a shifting of responsibility to powerful organisations and rights to individuals. Hand in hand comes the rise of the single issue and demise of political parties. A prime example is the issue of obesity, where emphasis on individual health warnings has been supplanted by suppliers food 'traffic light' schemes, and restrictions on marketing communications. Companies have been caught in a defensive position, there should have been more anticipation and earlier involvement.
So what are the socio-political mega-trends in your markets? Should - and how - will your organisation help customers respond to issues such as:
• Climate change
• Obesity
• Multi-culturalism
• Blood diamonds
• Gambling
• Affordable housing
• Living wages – be they for imported, foreign or outsourced workers
• Bird flu
• Education of ‘the underclass’
• Trade with countries abusing human rights such as Zimbabwe
• The European coalition of NGOs who want to make CSR compulsory
Do you know who wields power and influence in these areas and what solutions they are working on? If not, see Big Picture TV (www.big-picture.tv). Where should your organisation become a corporate activist driving and innovating for change? One CEO was recently heard cynically comparing carbon credits to green shield stamps – but look where Tesco has got utilising loyalty schemes for customer service!
Recommendations for further reading
• Investing in Corporate Social Responsibility (Editor John Hancock) - a thoughtful guide to best practice in CSR business planning by some of the UK’s leading companies
• The Next Hot Topic in CRM view...
• What Do Customers' Value Most view ...
• The Business of Climate Change – Lehman Brothers, Feb 2007
Now for some views by experts in the CSR field go to In my view .....
Costs v CSR: what do consumers really care about?
A model of compassionate capitalism
Case study: Bringing CSR to customers in the printing sector
Linking CSR and CRM: Shop and save (the environment)
jennifer.kirkby@mycustomer.com
Find out more about Jennifer Kirkby
MyCustomer.com 08-Feb-2007
Story read 6297 times